Full description not available
S**Y
Gorgeous, great fit
Beautiful, sexy, nice butt hugging, great length for men or women.I love mine, but so does my wife :-(
K**E
Fantastic board shorts
I love these. Totally color accurate. They dry quickly and they fit great. Makes me feel less insecure having had two babies and looks so cute with a bikini top
C**T
Perfect for confident beachgoer
Swim Trunks bold, retro style with vibrant print and a flattering, short cut that shows off legs. Quick-dry fabric and an adjustable waist, but the mesh lining might chafe if not soft. Perfect for confident beachgoer
T**.
Stylish
These shorts have made it through one summer, and I expect to get many more from them! They fit well, are as short as I wanted them to be (mid thigh), and seem sturdily made.
D**O
True to size good quality for not a lot of money
I was skeptical at first and then when I got them and put them on, I was very very happy. Really good quality, nice and soft silky and they look great. Great pattern, if you’re thinking about it, get them. They are a little bit shorter on the thigh, but I actually like that
M**
Great fit
Great fit. Love the retro lookTrue to size
Y**V
Just about perfect!
Got to say, these MaaMgic swim trunks are just about perfect for me. I use them for running and bicycling and occasionally swimming. They are the closest thing to 1970s, and 1980s style, and 30 years is how long I've been looking for them! Not quite 1970s size, longer inseams and length but I am cringing when I see the originals in old movies so this is a good compromise. I wear a large, inseam is just over 4" (4 1/8" versus claimed 4.5" for large - which is fine by me) and the legs are cut in a bit - most swim trunks on the market look a bit silly with straight legs, at least on me by having to wear large because of my big bottom.I would prefer solid colors, and MaaMgic makes a less expensive (about $5 less per pair) solid color model with the identical fit without the edge trim (also sold on Amazon) but these are superior in most ways. The fabric is softer with an amazing thread count, the less expensive ones are stiffer and make a bit of noise. However, the less expensive ones shed water faster and the mesh liner is a larger mesh also allowing water to go through easier. However the shorts I'm reviewing has a finer mesh liner and is far more comfortable for cycling. I really notice the difference after a couple hours ride.One other small peeve, they added stitching to the front to mimic a zipper flap. That seems silly to me, just as it would in men's running shorts. Also, my personal preference is to have the drawstring on the inside, but outside is where most makers have been putting them the last few years. None of the ones from the 1980s have outside ones.The 3 pockets on both models are just perfect.Edit 10/3/2013:Still love these. This Pixel design wore out after a 5,000 miles of bicycle touring in New Zealand. Using a stretch fabric would be the only suggestion as they pull slightly on the thighs with each pedal stroke. To some extent, the shorter inseam of this design does minimize this pull versus long inseam shorts.So reordered the Pixel when I returned home and to my surprise (after buying several designs in my size), Maagic has changed the sizing. The size large I previously purchased are now closer to extra large and baggy on me. I returned them for medium which are a better fit on me than the older large size.Also kudos on Maagic (specifically Baohui Fashion Store the current vendor name) for quickly replacing the mediums after Amazon's return period because of a defect I didn't notice initially.
K**N
Smaller than described.
Love the swallow design.Size i disappointing. This is the first and only pair of swim trunks. I found that list the thigh opening size. The XXL is listed as 29" thigh. It is not. It is closer to 27". That is enough to make a difference between. I love it, and I'm not sure I want to keep this.Thanks for listing more detail in the size chart. But try to do better next time. Measurements that are wrong are not only useless but misleading.
Trustpilot
1 week ago
2 weeks ago