Guyker Guitar Tune-O-Matic Saddle Bridge GM003 and Vintage Stop Bar Lock TP6 Tailpiece Combo Replacement Compatible with Les Paul LP SG Style 6 Strings Electric Guitar (Chrome)

I have purchased a few of these now and find that they are very good. I will likely buy them again for future projects.

Works as good as factory bridge

- Nice option/upgrade for Tune O Matic bridges- Not ABR style bridge, so, bridge can face either side- Comfortable to rest palm onInstalled on Westcreek Racer, had to swap out bridge pole/screw pieces with the pole pieces that came in bundleWill be looking at black and gold for other Tune O Matic swaps

I had a very beaten, older Epiphone Sheraton Ⅱ that had its output jack ripped out of the front. After trying to figure out how to make this natural guitar playable again without breaking the bank on filler and a re-fin job, I hit the shredded jack hole with a Dremel to widen the hole and install a Strat style boat jack, inverted to point up for cleaner cable strap pin security. But the boat jack made this elegant guitar look busy. So I decided to continue on with the busy aesthetics of it.Enter this Guyker set. I needed a new bridge and tailpiece anyway, as budget gold hardware fades and corrodes to pure ugly over time (IMHO). I obviously chose chrome hardware to match the boat jack plate, and this Guyker not only had the busy look to help distract from the unusual boat plate, but also the right price. And no, I’m not saying it’s busy looking in a bad way. I know it’s a classic style based on the Gibson TP-6. But the fine tuners themselves, no matter the maker, adds a look of busy. That’s what I wanted: A TP-6 style tailpiece on a budget.For me, it was a simple drop in. I found that it looked killer on the Sheraton Ⅱ, and I got many compliments, where most people didn’t even notice the unusual output jack at first. Tuning stability is outstanding as well, and no compromise to sustain or tone. I’d absolutely, 100% buy this tailpiece set again if needed.

I needed a new BM003 bridge and bought this unit. I should have ponied up for a better grade of replacement. I installed the BM003 bridge but first had to lube all of the intonation adjustment screws as the saddles moved unevenly and in places felt dangerously close to binding up. The tailpiece here was utterly worthless; one of the plastic thumbwheels was too small for its threads and popped out as soon as string tension was applied. (I had to remove strings and reinstall the previous tailpiece). I will have to use the bridge in this pack for now but will likely upgrade next string change, as this set is pretty low quality.

Its really good, dont know the brand but good quality

I originally got this to fill more negative space on my guitar. It's made the tone much louder and more lively than the previous bridge!

I build guitars, have since 2008. When I saw this, I thought, why not? Looks cool, might entice someone.But when I went to put it on standard spacing posts, it was a tad off, although it did go on. The saddles themselves, although twice in the description they say "roller", are just your normal V groove saddles. So the question becomes:If you have decent tuners, at least 18:1, (I have liked the 21:1 Guyker Lockers lately), why do I need micro tuners after a standard V groove bridge?And they say it reduces string breakage. Huh? The round holes in the back of a standard LP stop bar are just fine. These are slots, maybe just a slight hair easier to get the string in, but you have to remember to raise the micro tuners somewhat so when the strings do stretch, you can just crank one down a bit. Or just retune it, like we have all done for decades.Overall, looks cool, but this is a solution looking for a problem.But hey, it was cheap enough to try.