Pocahontas' Descendants, Third Corrections and Additions Paperback – March 27, 2010

Great work by Stuart E. Brown and company, this book and the second book Third Corrections has truly helped me in search of my ancestors of long ago. Thank you.

I haven't found a line to connect myself to yet but in hopes I'll find one for either me, husband or son-in-law.

Bought the original book so definitely I needed the corrections. thank you. A perfect sale.

Excellent catalogue of Pocahontas descendants

It arrived promptly and in good condition. This book is purely a supplement to the 1987 book. It's been reduced in physical size to 6" by 9" format by 3/8" thick, so the print is a bit small. Overall I thought a bit pricey for it's size.

Good read,full of info

I always wondered if I'm a descendant of Pocahontas since I saw this book.

UNTIL such a time that Bolling DNA project updates to Autosomal DNA testing the archives refelct that the Red Bollings are White Bollings , the White Bollings are White Bollings the Blue Bollings are really the Red Bollings.. Other records reflect also with some DNA se eLost Colony project in regards to the Bar creek Bowlings and Freemans UNDER ALGONQUIN EAST Proof that the Cherokee Bollings the Melungeon Bollings the Malango Bollings come further back classified the Blues. Much thanks to Ken Mike Sean Gary others for sharing their records and research It appears there are mix ups spelling variants timelimes and the wrong Robert Bollings The wrong John Bollings ect Title Bolling, Sarah. Publication1749 Gen. note Part of index to Chesterfield County Wills and Administrations (1754-1800) NoteLetters of administration granted on her estate to John Bolling, 6 October 1749. NoteChesterfield Order Book 1, p. 14. Subject - Persona lBolling, Sarah. Subject -Geographic Chesterfield County (Va.) Title Bolling, John. Publication1749 The Will of John Bolling, Jr., With Codicil may be found in the Chesterfield County Will Book No. 1, pages 262-268. "my Daughter Sarah Bolling" NOTE THIS IS Miss Sarah Bolling not Mrs Sarah Bolling above James Reid of Campbell county in 1784 of 42 acres of land on Blackwater creek (bounded by the lines of John Lynch and Jas. Reid), made by Bowling and Winifred Clark of Surry county, North Carolina, PTAIN HUMPHRIES DISTRICT - 1782 SURRY COUNTY, NC Bowling Clark- David Clark WILL continued Christopher Clark, f/o Bowling Clark below, loaned money to James Bowling [wife Mary] of Goochland before he died in 1729. 6th. To son, Bowling Clark, 4OO acres of land in Hanover county, lying on the northwest side joining the land of Thomas Carr, 2 young negroes, named Nance and Robin, one horse named Spret, one gun, one feather-bed and furniture, 2 cows and calves, my trooping arms, my great Bible and all my law-books. Title Read, John. Publication1753 Gen. notePart of index to Chesterfield County Wills and Administrations (1754-1800) NoteHis orphan, Mary Read, chose John Bolling as her guardian, 6 April 1753. NoteChesterfield Order Book 1, p. 319. Subject - PersonalRead, John. Subject -GeographicChesterfield County (Va.) MIKES NOTE Nancy Bolling who married Howell Lewis? Lewis was the great grandson of Augustine Warner and Mildred Reade of Warner Hall, Gloucester Co. He died in Granville Co., NC in 1814 but was down there in NC by 1770 or even earlier. Apparently owned land simultaneously in VA and NC. Howell is said to have married first Mary Isabella Willis, b. 1730 Fredericksburg, VA and in 1784 an "Ann" Bolling b. 1767 in Goochland Co., VA. Virginia gazette and independent chronicle. TitleMarried- On the 16th instant, Mr. Howel Lewis, to Miss Nancy Bolling, both of Goochland county. (p. 3, c. 1) Publication Monday, April 24, 1784. Gen. noteFrom the marriage and obituary citations compiled by Bernard J. Henley from Virginia newspapers on microfilm at the Library of Virginia. Other FormatAvailable on microfilm (Library of Virginia Film 44). Subject - Topical Marriage -- Virginia. The will of Christopher Clark, Sr., of Louisa Court, recorded May 28, 1754, bequeathed: "1st. To son, Edward, one gun and all my wearing clothes and all things else, that he is possessed of, that was ever mine. Author Clark, Edward. grantee. Title Land grant 15 December 1749. Summary Location: Lunenburg County. Description: 154 acres on the branches of Butchers Creek, and adjoining John Bolling. Source: Land Office Patents No. 27, 1748-1749, p. 527 (Reel 25). Part of the index to the recorded copies of patents for land issued by the Secretary of the Colony serving as the colonial Land Office. The collection is housed in the Archives at the Library of Virginia. Other FormatAvailable on microfilm. Virginia State Land Office. Patents 1-42, reels 1-41. RelatedSee also the following surname(s): Clarke. Subject - Personal Clark, Edward. grantee. Here's a James Bowlin who came into the Colony of VA in 1671. Thomas Ludwell, Esqr., 2994 A., 2 R., 35 P., on S. side of Chickahominy Swamp, 7 Apr. 1671, PB 6,p.352. 2093 A. 1 R. 25 P, at a run called Col. Wynn's Quarter, to a run above Pomonkey Path, over Cowtayle quarter run, & c....Henrico Co., at head of Mr. Richard Cock, Sr., to Mr. Green, ... by. Jno. Beauchamp, deserted, now due by order and importation of 60 pers.(goes on to give origin of all the property mentioned): The 60 persons are named: Near the last are Jno. Cotton & James Bowlin. __________________ This interesting headright is James Bowlin, imported into the area of Chickahominy Swamp, and the Pamunkey path. This area is where the Powhatan Indians were, and not so far From James Ft. II, owned by Thomas Rolfe. Likely Profile of James Bowlin, bc 1650 into VA in 1671. If he died in 1729 he would have been about 79 years old. Questions,is this the man connected to Chistopher Clark? If it is he died in 1729, south side of the James River, in Henrico Co. And said a group 5. AS you can see anything goes the probablity to the Marylad by timeline and naming pattern is pretty strong Who could be used as a headright? The short answer is that any person immigrating into Virginia was a potential headright. As the documents quoted above make clear, anyone transported into Virginia with the intent to inhabit was a valid headright. (The early records of the Company suggest that those who died on the voyage were valid headrights as well.) There were initially no stated restrictions on point of origin. While the vast majority of 17th century immigrants to Virginia came from England, persons entering Virginia from Europe, the Caribbean, Africa, or even from other North American colonies were also legitimate headrights. There are several known cases of headrights who simply moved across the Potomac from Maryland. Some of the Indians claimed as headrights must surely have migrated from other mainland colonies. In 1699 Governor Nicholson eliminated the use of slaves as headrights, and restricted rights to English citizens. There were no restrictions on age or gender. Headrights could be, and often were, children. In fact, many imported indentured servants were teenagers. Persons settled in Virginia who subsequently left the colony and returned were sometimes successfully claimed as headrights. A number of patents claimed importation of a specific person “the second time” or the “the third time” (or in one case, a total of six times.) Although this seems contradictory to the spirit of the system, it appears to have been an accepted practice from the very beginning, for several Ancient Planters claimed multiple rights for their own arrivals in Virginia. Because there was no system for validating or accounting for headright usage, headrights were often claimed more than once, and persons who had no “intent to inhabit” were used as headrights. More on this later. Process for claiming headrights The process required one to first produce a receipt, or make oath, of their right to the importation of one or more persons and to testify that no previous certificate had been issued for those persons. This proof could be produced either at a local county court or to the Council itself. The clerk issued a certificate of importation, which was then validated by the Secretary’s office. In counties where court records of the period survive, the issuance of hundreds of these certificates are recorded. Unfortunately, these records rarely indicate the date or other circumstances of the importations. The certificate became, in effect, a land warrant. (The Secretary’s office actually issued a separate document which served as the warrant.) It was used to order a survey, at the completion of which both the certificate and survey were submitted to the Secretary’s office where the patent was prepared and the names usually copied into the patent. There was apparently no time limit on the use of these certificates. Most were used within a few years, but a few cases are known in which the certificate was not used for several decades. Relationship between patentee and headright Genealogists tend to assume that a headright was imported by the patentee who claimed him. This seems an unwarranted assumption. Unless we find a court record for the certificate, we can’t know the importer’s identity. Once obtained, headright certificates could be bought and sold like any other property, and the evidence is that they frequently changed hands prior to being turned into patent claims. Thus the person receiving the patent may have neither imported nor employed the headrights he claimed. In fact, studies comparing court-issued certificates to the resulting patents indicate that about half of all patents were issued to someone other than the original headright certificate holder. For headright certificates issued 1637-1652 in Lower Norfolk, about 40% of headrights were claimed in patents by someone other than the person to whom the original certificate was issued. For Surry certificates issued a generation later in 1673-92, the percentage rose to 64%. [See the studies of Surry and Lower Norfolk headrights elsewhere on this website.] Both studies also showed that personal headrights were transferred in about the same proportion as other rights. That is, persons who obtained headright certificates for the importation of themselves and family members transferred them to others about half the time. William Bolling that testified in St Marys Co Maryland in a court case in 1712 that hed known the man on trial many years before when he had lived in Virginia. he is also a son of another William Bolling that died as a young adult in 1686 in Gloucester Co va. this William Bolling of the court case also told the court he was a descendant of Jane Rolph (rolfe) of Va. BOWLING, JOHN St. Mary's CO. MD > 30th Apr. 1711 > 9th June, 1711 > To JAMES MARTIN and hrs, "High Park," St. Mary's CO. > To sons WILLIAM and JOHN, all other lands by patent certificate or deed > in St. Mary's Co. > To son THOMAS, 2 tracts, "Charley" and "Chessam" on s. side of Myrie branch. > To wife MARY, extx., residue of "Charley" and "Chessam" and "Charley's Addition" > during life; to revert to son THOMAS at her decease. > 600 A., "The Widow's Mite" to be sold for benefit of estate. > To dau. MARY, and JAMES HADDOCK, priest, personalty. > Should wife die during minority of child., Capt. BENJAMIN HALL to have charge of > THOMAS and JAMES HAGAN of other children., other children.,. NOTE OTHER CHILDREN not mentioned in the Will. William Bolling that testified inSst Marys co Maryland in a court case in 1712 that hed known the man on trial many years before when he had lived in Virginia. he is also a son of another William Bolling that died as a young adult in 1686 in Gloucester co Va. this Wlliam Bolling of the court case also told the court he was a descendant of Jane Rolph (rolfe) of Va. ive only been able to see the summary of this court case posted on the MAryland online archives and it dont say what this court case was about nor does it say what the man on trial had done this William Bollling did testify that hed known him when he lived in Va Bowling, Robert. grantee. TitleLand grant 21 April 1690. SummaryLocation: Happamatuck River County. Description: 166 acres known by the name of the Parson’s old house. Beginning at a corner stump standing between puddle Dock Creek and &c river. Source: Land Office Patents No. 8, 1689-1695, p. 31 (Reel 8). Part of the index to the recorded copies of patents for land issued by the Secretary of the Colony serving as the colonial Land Office. The collection is housed in the Archives at the Library of Virginia. Other FormatAvailable on microfilm. Virginia State Land Office. Patents 1-42, reels 1-41. Subject - Personal Bowling, Robert. grantee. Subject - Topical Land titles. -- Registration and transfer -- Virginia -- Happamatuck River County. Subject -Geographic Happamatuck River County (Va.) -- History -- 17th century. Genre/FormLand grants -- Virginia -- Happamatuck River County. Maryland online Archives and it dont say what this court case was about nor does it say what the man on trial had done this William Bolling did testify that hed known him when he lived in Va Whom is the Rebecca Bolling born 1664 that married a Mr. Prendergast in Va Northumberland Co Va and they moved to NC and both lived unto old age dying after 1750 their descendants maintain that she was the daughter of Jane Rolfe. Michael2 Pendergrass (Prendergast), 1664? If the family tradition is true that we descend from Pocahontas, then Michael may have married into the Bolling family which claims descent from Thomas Rolfe b. 1616?, son of John Rolfe and Pocahontas, 1595?-1617, daughter of Powhatan. Thomas Rolfe's daughter Jane married Capt. Thomas Bolling and their son John Bolling had one son and five daughters. Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1681-1683 Bowlin, Thomas, 543. Bowlin, William, 545. Bowling, Capt., 58, 543. Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1681-1683 Liber W. C. Layd out by me this ffoure and twentyeth day of ffebruary 1681 The above certificate is according George Yate (sealed) to Survey by us made as Wit- nesse our hands &seales John Craycroft Corr (sealed) Ninian Beale(sealed) John Smith (sealed) Tho: Greenfeild (sealed)Jno Chittam (sealed) Thomas Gant(sealed) Samll Magroder (sealed) John Bowlen (sealed) Robt Standly (sealed) Wm Selby (sealed) Thomas Ellis(sealed) ffrancis swinfen (sealed) Lawrence Rowland (sealed) Bowling (Bowlin), Anne, 130; , . James, 111, 130, 335, 469, 529; , , John, 14, 520. Children of Michael2 and -- [Bolling]: 1. John3 Pendergrass of Northumberland Co., Va., 1686?-1715. See below. 2. [Dau.? m. Henry Hutson (Hudson) (1715 Northumberland Co. Adm. of John3)] The book by Col William Bryd ive read his secret diary and ive read his other book too over the blue ridge or something and he doesnt call Robert Bolling ii "Robin" and further as this diary or journal was written in the year 1728 two years before the real Robert Bolling iii was borne in Bristol parish Prince George co Va. the Robert Bolling he called young Robin in the book cant be Robert Bolling iii either. as a matter of fact though he mentions not one Robert Bolling in that journal he mentions three two of them now unkown Col William Byrds secret diary he refers to three Robert Bollings if you count the young "ROBIN" as a Robert Bolling then he referred to three of them two that went with him on his trip with ten young gentlemen to set the line between the colonies of Va and NC. Only two went on that trip and they were hired one young Robin as a valet for one of the ten young men Col William Byrd ii had along on that trip over the blue ridge in 1728. and the other that went on that trip was a Robert Bolling a Woodsman one of five hired to safely escort them on the trip in 1728. as Dinwiddie Co. Va was the woods then those two unknown Robert Bollings are probably those that was living in Dinwiddie co. Va. as Dinwiddie Co Va became a county in 1724 but the first court wasnt held until I belive 1732 Two unknown Robert Bolling the woodsman and Robert Robin Bolling the valet and servant of one of those ten young men was probably an eight year old young robin hired on and his father was probably the woodsman hired to escort the party one of five over the blue ridge. the other Robert Bolling and the third whom didnt make this trip over the blue ridge was Col Robert Bolling ii whose plantation they stopped at on their return back to report in Williamsburg to the Gov. and in his report to the gov he makes the distinction that young Robins pay was a Rrivate hire between the young gentleman and wasnt to be a cost borne by the colony. at know time does he imply that these two unknown Robert Bollings the woodsman and the young Robin Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712 St Marys Interrogatorys made to M.r Rob.t Bowlin 1.st Are you acquainted with M.r Charles Calvert were you ever evidence to any Deed made by him to his brother Rich.d Calvert 2.dly Were you made acquainted with the purport and Contents of the said Deed 3.dly What year and what month of the year was the Service Delivered by the said Charles Calvert to his Brother Richard and what More do you know of this Matter 4.thly Were you ever Wittness to any other Deed or writing made to y.e said Richard Calvert by his brother Charles 5.thly Did you ever hear the said Charles say to what Intent & Purpose he made over the said Land to his Brother Richard Did you ever hear the said Richard say or promise to make over the said Land to M.rs Mary Adderton & her heires 6.thly When were you first acquainted with M.r Rich.d Calvert By Virtue of and in obedience to a Comission out of the high Court of Chancery of this Province of Maryland to us directed and bearing Date the first day of November 1710 Nominating & appointing us Comiss.rs to Examin Evidences in and Concerning a Cause in the said Depending Between James Neale Jerm Adderton & ux.r Compl.ts and Rich.d Calvert Who being due manner and for me Sworne maketh upon the holy Evangel Oath the following Answ.rs to the Severall Interrogatorys hereunto annext Viz.t To y.e 1.st Int.ry M.r Robert Bowlin Answereth that he was very acquainted with Charles Calvert and that this Depon.t having knowne him for about Sixteen or Seaventeen years and that the said Depon.t was never wittness to any Deed concerning or relating to ^from^ Charles Calvert to his brother Richard but only one which was made by the said Charles to the Said Richard To the Second Answered that the Said Deed was not Read to this Depon.t but at the same time that the said Deed was Signed Sealed & Acknowledged by the said Charles to the Said Richard then the Said Richard told this Depon.t that it was Concerning a Mannor of Land that Lyes at Piscattaway in Maryland To y.e 5.th Answered that this Depon.t never heard neither Charles Calvert nor his brother Richard say to what Intent and purpose the said Land was made over to Rich.d Calv.t by his brother Charles To y.e 6.th Answered that about twelve years agoe was the full time of this Depon.ts being acquainted with M.r Rich.d Calvert he being then in Virginia along with his Mother And further Saith not Signum Robert R Bowlin Decemb.r 2.d 1710 Then came Robert Bowlin before us the Com.rs appointed & made oath on the hold Evangelist to the Severall Answers as above Wittness our hands and Seales Walt.r Story (S) Charles Jones (S) NOTE this Robert Bowling middle name was R most possible ROBIN Who is Jane Rolfe those deeds to the fort names three woman and there husbands sueing a forth couple to get the land Thomas Rolfe had rented back. after his death. Not one of them three husbands is named Bolling and not one of them girls is named Jane. Check the Lib of VA records folks. its there. them deeds are the proof. Thomas Rolfe was given that land in 1643 that the old Smithtown Gort sat on it was about 1200 acres and thats where the court of old Rapphannock co. Va sent the body for its burial those records are real. Hes not buried in Kippax. Thomas Rolfe as shown by these deeds to the old Smithtown fort later a plantation of Thomas rolfe. The court case names all three of his daughters and their husbands when they sued this other couple to get possession of the part of the plantation he had rented before his death. This is in what became Sussex co Va. It was old Rapphahannock Co before the records are intact and in the possession of the Lib of Va. all three names of Thomas Rolfes daughters and their last names. but this one that married this Mason Thomas Rolfe had two wives and two families The wives and sepearate families was to get those lands in each colony. there is also a Col John Rolfe of New Jersey his descendants also maintain that he was a descendant of Thomas Rolfe that left Va and moved to eastern New Jersey when it became a colony under a Lord Baltimore I believe it was anyways it would appear that Thomas Rolfe got around and had many wives and many children. . [Virginia Colonial Abstracts, Volume III, Charles City County Court Orders and Fragments, 1664-96, FTM CD187 Family History: VA Genealogies #3, 1600s-1800s] p. 6. Abstract. Com of admr jointly to Maj Fran: Poythres and Mr Peter Read on est of Anne Young decd. Est to be equally div betw orphans of dec'd. Maj Poythres and Mr Robt Bolling give bond L50. Sterl. Mr Peter Read and Mr. John Jean give bond in same amt. [ibid.] p. 89. Att a Court holden att Westover the third day of March 1696 Annoq Reg: Doni Rs Guiel: 3:9. The Justices present were Cap Daniel Lewellin, Cap't Charles Goodrich, Mr. Robert Bolling and Capt John Hamlin. [ibid.] p. 90. Abstract. Robt Bolling vs Thos Vinson to next Court. [ibid.] Chancery Court, Chancery Record, 1671-1712 St Marys Interrogatorys made to M.r Rob.t Bowlin 1.st Are you acquainted with M.r Charles Calvert were you ever evidence to any Deed made by him to his brother Rich.d Calvert 2.dly Were you made acquainted with the purport and Contents of the said Deed 3.dly What year and what month of the year was the Service Delivered by the said Charles Calvert to his Brother Richard and what More do you know of this Matter 4.thly Were you ever Wittness to any other Deed or writing made to y.e said Richard Calvert by his brother Charles 5.thly Did you ever hear the said Charles say to what Intent & Purpose he made over the said Land to his Brother Richard Did you ever hear the said Richard say or promise to make over the said Land to M.rs Mary Adderton & her heires 6.thly When were you first acquainted with M.r Rich.d Calvert By Virtue of and in obedience to a Comission out of the high Court of Chancery of this Province of Maryland to us directed and bearing Date the first day of November 1710 Nominating & appointing us Comiss.rs to Examin Evidences in and Concerning a Cause in the said Depending Between James Neale Jerm Adderton & ux.r Compl.ts and Rich.d Calvert Who being due manner and for me Sworne maketh upon the holy Evangel Oath the following Answ.rs to the Severall Interrogatorys hereunto annext Viz.t To y.e 1.st Int.ry M.r Robert Bowlin Answereth that he was very acquainted with Charles Calvert and that this Depon.t having knowne him for about Sixteen or Seaventeen years and that the said Depon.t was never wittness to any Deed concerning or relating to ^from^ Charles Calvert to his brother Richard but only one which was made by the said Charles to the Said Richard To the Second Answered that the Said Deed was not Read to this Depon.t but at the same time that the said Deed was Signed Sealed & Acknowledged by the said Charles to the Said Richard then the Said Richard told this Depon.t that it was Concerning a Mannor of Land that Lyes at Piscattaway in Maryland To y.e 5.th Answered that this Depon.t never heard neither Charles Calvert nor his brother Richard say to what Intent and purpose the said Land was made over to Rich.d Calv.t by his brother Charles To y.e 6.th Answered that about twelve years agoe was the full time of this Depon.ts being acquainted with M.r Rich.d Calvert he being then in Virginia along with his Mother And further Saith not Signum Robert R Bowlin Decemb.r 2.d 1710 Then came Robert Bowlin before us the Com.rs appointed & made oath on the hold Evangelist to the Severall Answers as above Wittness our hands and Seales Walt.r Story (S) Charles Jones (S) Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1666-1670 Memorandum that the xviith day of November in the xxxviiith LiberJJ yeare of the Dominion of Caecilius &c Annoq Dom MDClxix Rich- [p.459] and Marsham of Calvert County planter being presented by the grand inquest of Calvert County by the information of William Collins John Bowlin and George Lingam concerning the death of Jenkin Rice his servant which presentment amongst other things was re- turned to this Court. Wherefore Comand was given to the sheriff of St Maries County 376 Charles County Court Proceedings, 1662-1666. Liber B John Browne Sworne and examined in open Court sayeth: that [p. 144] hee heard James boulin say that the Calph which Mr Arthur Turnor had in keeping of W George bradshows was aliue in August last and further sayeth not: Mr James Lendsey Sworne and examined in open Count sayeth that hee heard James bouline Aske W Arthur Turnor whearfore hee did arest him and W Tumor Replyed againe doe you not know it is for slandering of mee well answered James boulin I was in formed by Richard Tarlin and his wife that the Calph that belonged to John Ashbrookes Cow was aliue in August last without you killed it and Eat it and James bowlin sayd to Mr Turnor I am sorry for it if I haue done you wronge for Richard Tarlin Came to Mr Tumors hows the next day and sayd hee neuer sayd such a word in his life to James boulin and further sayeth not: Dauid Prichard Sworne and examined in open Count sayeth that hee did heare James boulin aske Mr Tumor whearfon hee did Arest him and Mr Tumor Replied againe doe you not know it is for slander ing of mee well answered James boulin I was informed by Richard Tarlin and his wife that the Calph that belonged to John Ashbnookes Cow was aliue in August last without you killed it and eat it and James bowlin sayd to Mr Turnor I am sorry for it if I haue done you wronge and Richard Tarlin Came to Mr Turnors bows the next day and sayd hee neuer sayd such a word in his life to James bowlin and further sayeth not: All things beeing beeing dewly seariously and Maturely Consid ered thear appeared no Cause of action on the plantiues sid and the defendant humbly Crauing a nonsuit with Cost and Charge of suit It is thearfor ordered that the Plantiuc shoold bee nonsuited and pay the Cost and Change of suit: [p. 145] Richard and Mary dod Plantiue The Plantiue aresting John and Joane neuill Defendants the defendants in an ac by thear Atturney Mr Francis batchelor tion defamation prefer eth thear declaration as followeth Proceedings of the County Court of Charles County, 1658-1666 Mr George Bradshow sworne and examined in open Court sayeth that beeing heare the last Court James boulin came to him and tould him that hee had baught a Cow and a Calph and a steare of Daniell Jonson which was mine but I told him I did not sell him a Calph for the Calph was dead as Mr Turner told this deponant and the sayd boulin answered this deponant that hee Coold Proue that the Caiph was aliue in August and beliue that it was now lining and further sayeth not: Mr Daniell Johnson Sworne and examined in open Count Sayeth that hee heard James boulin say that hee woold find the Calph for it was aliue if it was not killed and eaten and further sayeth not: Proceedings of the County Court of Charles County, 1658-1666 Mr Arthur Tumor Plantiue The Plantiue aresting the defendant in James Boulin Defendant Jan action of the Case the Defendant Craueth a referance which was granted Proceedings of the County Court of Charles County, 1658-1666 John Waltom aged forty years or thearabouts examined upon oath declareth that beeing at Mr Turnors Mr tumor then demanded of James boulin sixty pounds of tobacco which the sayd Turnor sayd hee had payd to John Neuill for the accoumpt of the sayd Boulin and James boulin denied to allow it; the sayd Turnor answared that hee thought that Thomas Stone woold baffell with him lickwise for hee had done the licke Curtesie for him further sayeth not Jurauit Coram me July 27th James Neale Recorded Sept.r 12.th 173 BOWLING, JOHN St. Mary's CO. MD > 30th Apr. 1711 > 9th June, 1711 > To JAMES MARTIN and hrs, "High Park," St. Mary's CO. > To sons WILLIAM and JOHN, all other lands by patent certificate or deed> in St. Mary's Co.> To son THOMAS, 2 tracts, "Charley" and "Chessam" on s. side of Myriebranch. > To wife MARY, extx., residue of "Charley" and "Chessam" and "Charley'sAddition" > during life; to revert to son THOMAS at her decease> 600 A., "The Widow's Mite" to be sold for benefit of estate.> To dau. MARY, and JAMES HADDOCK, priest, personalty.> Should wife die during minority of child., Capt. BENJAMIN HALL to havecharge of > THOMAS and JAMES HAGAN of other children.,. William Bolling that testified inSst Marys co Maryland in a court case in 1712 that hed known the man on trial many years before when he had lived in Virginia. he is also a son of another William Bolling that died as a young adult in 1686 in Gloucester co Va. this Wlliam Bolling of the court case also told the court he was a descendant of Jane Rolph (rolfe) of Va. ive only been able to see the summary of this court case posted on the MAryland online archives and it dont say what this court case was about nor does it say what the man on trial had done this William Bollling did testify that hed known him when he lived in Va Bowling, Robert. grantee. TitleLand grant 21 April 1690. SummaryLocation: Happamatuck River County. Description: 166 acres known by the name of the Parson’s old house. Beginning at a corner stump standing between puddle Dock Creek and &c river. Source: Land Office Patents No. 8, 1689-1695, p. 31 (Reel 8). Part of the index to the recorded copies of patents for land issued by the Secretary of the Colony serving as the colonial Land Office. The collection is housed in the Archives at the Library of Virginia. Other FormatAvailable on microfilm. Virginia State Lan