SkagenMen's Jorn Three-Hand Band Watch

Very good watch. It might be difficult for those used to digital read-out time pieces to learn to read a watch the old fashioned way, especially because there are no numbers. The lack of numbers creates a clean, minimalist face. Thin and classy looking. I put a somewhat expensive real leather band ($50) on it as it deserves. Very comfortable.

Very nice, simple watch. Perfect for the minimalists. Thin setting. Soft leather band. Color is true to picture (brown).

I have two Skagen watches. They are nicer than the other cheap brands, though a little more expensive. The silver is shiny, not brushed. Nice thick band, but not very supple. Simple and elegant...no complaints.

Caught this on sale for $60. Very nice watch. Seemed to be well build, thin but substantial weight for its size. Attractive. I got it as a gift. I knew it would be borderline size wise, but since it was so thin I thought it might work. They loved the watch, but it was indeed entirely too big. We never took the stickers or tags off. If it had been 38mm it would have been perfect. I returned it thanks to Amazon’s return policy.

I have a number ofSkagen watches and love how slender and sleek they are. I have always gone for the leather strap, however decided to try a mesh band and love it. It was easy to size and attach the band. My only issue is with the black face and numbers, it is difficult to see. I wear for dress occasions so it is more about the rather than being able to tell time. Skagen gets my vote for price point and for a wide variety of options.

Skagen Signatur Men's Watch with Stainless Steel Mesh or Leather Band, Minimalist Watch for Men (BLACK)I really wanted to love this watch. In reality it’s such a dark face that reading the time would only be possible only in bright light. Darn. Beautiful otherwise.

Bought this for my 20yo son he feels sophisticated now! Great looking watch for all occasions.

Son liked the watch. Very nice unit. Amazon sent lipstick the first time we ordered the watch. Second time was correct.